|
Again was the Bijou Theatre almost packed to | the doors on Sunday night, when Mr Frank Hyett | brilliantly lectured upon |
During the evening the customary collective | singing was heartily indulged in. The orchestra | under Mr Wm. Spangler's skilful baton, rendered a | couple of enjoyable selections, while the choir | bracketed
Mr N. Anderson briefly addressed those present
| upon the position of the Socialist Co-operative
| Society, and urged the Society's claims to
| increased support. A few Swedish comrades were
| right warmly welcomed to Melbourne. The Broken
| Hill friends who were in Melbourne for the Sunday
|
Mrs Katz ably moved the following resolution:
|
|
In a speechlet of restrained
| feeling, Mrs Katz declared of the agents of
| capitalism,
|
Holland's sacrifice must not
| be in vain. Australian Socialism had a duty to
| perform. And as many as were jailed, as many
| others would take their places. The resolution was
| put by the chairman asking all in favour to shout
|
At seven minutes past eight Mr Hyett was called | upon. He was magnificently received. After | commenting briefly upon the Albury sentences of | working-class fighters, he proceeded to | acknowledge the indebtedness of Socialism to the | secularist movement, and thanked secularism for | the intellectual atmosphere it had created. But it | was also necessary to remove political and | economic superstition and he ventured to claim | Socialism deserved the support of all | rationalists.
| Dealing with Ingersoll, the lecturer sketched
| his life, and next surveyed him as lawyer, as
| politician and soldier, as orator and agnostic. In
| what fine passages he did homage to Ingersoll's
| genius, and with what impassioned eloquence he
| defended his loftiness of thought, greatness of
| life, and fight for free and clear thinking, we
| shall not attempt to portray. He made his points
| well; said that even Christianity owed a debt to
| Ingersoll, emphasised that Ingersoll did not
| attack the Bible for the fun of it, and by
| quotations and deductions indicated Ingersoll's
| charm and force in manner and method. The lecturer
| reached his height in calling upon the people to
| teach their children how to make this world purer,
| sweeter and grander. His peroration included a
| striking tribute to Colonel Ingersoll's
|
|
As to revivalism, Mr Hyett read an unanswered | letter he had sent to Dr Chapman relative to the | latter's remarks upon Ingersoll and also one | received from the Rev F. Sinclaire. He stigmatised | the present "revival" as a travesty upon true | religion, and claimed that revivalism didn't help | in working class emancipation.
|The Chapman meetings were morally harmful, and | were calculated to chloroform the workers in | respect to immediate social needs. Touching Dr | Chapman's discourse of that day, he (Mr Hyett) was | there to say the iron did not swim, and to further | say there was no teaching so ruinous and | fallacious as that salvation or emancipation was | by belief, and not by works. God had made no man | his mouthpiece to speak contrary to fact. Every | man had the right to think and to his opinion. | There was no question so sacred as to be above | intellectual consideration.
|The lecturer, in the course of his remarks, | several times recurred to the need of more | assertive rationalist propaganda in Melbourne, and | these sentiments were always applausively | endorsed.
|On Sunday night next the speaker will be the | Rev F. Sinclaire, on