|

|

| | | |

|

Again was the Bijou Theatre almost packed to | the doors on Sunday night, when Mr Frank Hyett | brilliantly lectured upon | | "Robert G. Ingersoll, the Man and his | Message" and supplementary thereto | dissected revivalism and the Chapman-Alexander | mission. The audience was in the main | appreciative, and as a whole markedly attentive. | Mr J Curtin presided.

|

During the evening the customary collective | singing was heartily indulged in. The orchestra | under Mr Wm. Spangler's skilful baton, rendered a | couple of enjoyable selections, while the choir | bracketed | "Awake Sweet Love" | | "Now is the Time of | Maying," as its applauded item. Miss | Bertha Gross very sweetly gave | "Bonnie Mary of | Argyll," and was bounteously approved. Mr | Levien, with the S.P. Banner as his text, recited | a piece of his own composition, entitled | "Against the | Enemy." The band played in the arcade with | its usual gracefulness. Mrs Mann, Miss Young, and | Miss Ruby Paxton accompanied at the | pianoforte.

|

Mr N. Anderson briefly addressed those present | upon the position of the Socialist Co-operative | Society, and urged the Society's claims to | increased support. A few Swedish comrades were | right warmly welcomed to Melbourne. The Broken | Hill friends who were in Melbourne for the Sunday | - seven or eight of them | - were tendered an ovation. Mr Syd. | Robinson and F.A. Beck each said a few words | brightly and with enthusiastic approval.

|

Mrs Katz ably moved the following resolution: | - | In a speechlet of restrained | feeling, Mrs Katz declared of the agents of | capitalism, | Holland's sacrifice must not | be in vain. Australian Socialism had a duty to | perform. And as many as were jailed, as many | others would take their places. The resolution was | put by the chairman asking all in favour to shout | - and the answering shout shook the | building.

|

At seven minutes past eight Mr Hyett was called | upon. He was magnificently received. After | commenting briefly upon the Albury sentences of | working-class fighters, he proceeded to | acknowledge the indebtedness of Socialism to the | secularist movement, and thanked secularism for | the intellectual atmosphere it had created. But it | was also necessary to remove political and | economic superstition and he ventured to claim | Socialism deserved the support of all | rationalists.

|

Dealing with Ingersoll, the lecturer sketched | his life, and next surveyed him as lawyer, as | politician and soldier, as orator and agnostic. In | what fine passages he did homage to Ingersoll's | genius, and with what impassioned eloquence he | defended his loftiness of thought, greatness of | life, and fight for free and clear thinking, we | shall not attempt to portray. He made his points | well; said that even Christianity owed a debt to | Ingersoll, emphasised that Ingersoll did not | attack the Bible for the fun of it, and by | quotations and deductions indicated Ingersoll's | charm and force in manner and method. The lecturer | reached his height in calling upon the people to | teach their children how to make this world purer, | sweeter and grander. His peroration included a | striking tribute to Colonel Ingersoll's | |

|

As to revivalism, Mr Hyett read an unanswered | letter he had sent to Dr Chapman relative to the | latter's remarks upon Ingersoll and also one | received from the Rev F. Sinclaire. He stigmatised | the present "revival" as a travesty upon true | religion, and claimed that revivalism didn't help | in working class emancipation.

|

The Chapman meetings were morally harmful, and | were calculated to chloroform the workers in | respect to immediate social needs. Touching Dr | Chapman's discourse of that day, he (Mr Hyett) was | there to say the iron did not swim, and to further | say there was no teaching so ruinous and | fallacious as that salvation or emancipation was | by belief, and not by works. God had made no man | his mouthpiece to speak contrary to fact. Every | man had the right to think and to his opinion. | There was no question so sacred as to be above | intellectual consideration.

|

The lecturer, in the course of his remarks, | several times recurred to the need of more | assertive rationalist propaganda in Melbourne, and | these sentiments were always applausively | endorsed.

|

On Sunday night next the speaker will be the | Rev F. Sinclaire, on | "The Shame of our Streets."