|

<12 October 1917> |

| |

|

In approaching the subject of the Shakespearian | drama, we must take into account two factors, In the | first place the Renaissance, or Revival of Learning, | brought about the intellectual atmosphere that made | the master dramatist's work both possible and | acceptable; and in the second place the Miracle Plays | of earlier centuries supplied the shell, or mould, | into which the intellectual bronze was cast. That is | why the spirit of the Renaissance, which in Italy was | expressed in Art, and in Germany in religious | discontent, found its voice in England in the Drama | of Shakespeare and his contemporaries.

|

We saw in our first article on the Drama that the | drama of ancient Greece had its origin in the magic | ritual of Dionysos. The gradual development of this | ritual led eventually to the highly complex comedies | and tragedies of Athens and Rome. With the decadence | of the Roman Empire the public tastes declined, and | the Circus and the Hippodrome - the | gladiatorial contests and the chariot races | - gradually displaced the drama, and what | little remained of the latter was debased to the | level of music hall performances. Theodora, wife of | Justinian, a great Eastern emperor, was an actress on | the debased stage of Constantinople, and also a keen | partisan in the chariot contests. Her patronage of | the "Blues," against the "Greens," resulted in the | disastrous Nika Riots in which thousands of people | lost their lives. At last the invasions of the | barbarians, together with the ascetic moral code of | the early church, succeeded in suppressing both the | grandeur and excesses of the ancient world.

|

But at a later date, especially when her | missionary efforts extended to the Northern Races, | the church found the stage a very valuable propaganda | agent. People in those days, it must be remembered, | could not read, and some more vivid method of | presenting views than by mere preaching was required. | To meet this want legends from the New and Old | Testaments were acted. The Deluge, the Tower of | Babel, the Return of the Prodigal, were amongst the | subjects commonly dealt with and the mode of | presentation was both rough and indecorous. Later on | legends from the lives of saints, and incidents in | the history of the church were introduced. The latter | were spoken of as Miracle Plays, the former as | Mystery Plays. At first the actors were priests, | monks, and novices, and the theatre the Church, but | as these performances rapidly grew in popularity the | stage was removed to the village green, and the | actors became gradually more secular in character. No | doubt the performances on the green became confused | with the Maypole dance, which, as we have seen in an | earlier article, was really, in origin, a magical | ritual of the same order as the Mysteries of | Dionysos.

|

Eventually the plays passed completely from the | church to another very interesting mediaeval | institution, or set of institutions - | the Guilds. Without discussing minutely the character | of the latter, it may be said that they resembled | trade unions, although they included both masters and | men, and they also functioned as benefit and secret | societies. Guild membership, in mediaeval England, | was to a large extent the test of citizenship. | However, the annual festivals of the guilds closely | resembled our own Eight Hours Celebrations. They were | marked by processions, with banners and trade | displays, sports, and last but not least, the | performance of Miracle Plays. Wakefield, Chester, and | Coventry were the great gathering centres of the | guilds. The usual practice was for each Trade Guild | to perform a separate miracle, and the gatherings | consequently lasted for several days, and sometimes | for weeks.

|

From 1100 to 1400 A.D. the Miracle Plays were the | only drama performed in England. But from the latter | date, which, by the way, was marked by the death of | Chaucer, the father of English poetry, a new | development was noticeable. Imagination was allowed | freer play. Personified abstract introductions, such | as Vice, Virtue, Folly, were introduced, and rapidly | took possession of the whole stage. The new departure | gave us the Morality Play. | "Everywoman" is a modern revival of this | pre-Shakespearian form, and | "The Passing of the Third Floor | Back," an adaptation of the same type. As | both of these plays have appeared in Perth within the | past few years, it is hardly necessary to say more | about the Morality Play, except to note that, with | its appearance, the playwright was freed from the | tyranny of the Biblical text, and might use his | imagination and creative power as he willed so long | as he continued to deal with abstractions. But even | this restriction gradually gave way, even before the | flood-tide of Renaissance ideas reached England. The | temptation to make Vice a caricature of the village | drunkard, Virtue a picture of the charitable lady, | Folly of the smart young coxcomb, is very obvious, | and no doubt many a portly local dignitary came in | for a more or less complimentary | characterisation.

|

Then came the Renaissance. Its first dramatic | expressions in England towards the middle of the | Sixteenth century took the form of a few plays, | written in Latin, and carefully modelled after Platus | and Seneca, two Latin writers who lived in the first | century A.D.

|

These efforts are only important as symptoms of | the coming age. In 1574, Queen Elizabeth granted | permission for plays to be staged in London, and the | first regular theatres were opened in 1576. Very | shabby structures they were, compared with the | palaces of drama with which we are familiar, but on | the other hand their stages were graced, with the | most intense products of dramatic genius that the | world has seen, either before or since, excepting | only those of the great days of Greece.

|

The building, as we have seen, was rough. The | stage settings were meagre, the scenery imaginary. | The stage jutted out into the middle of the "yard" | - the portion occupied by the stalls | in modern theatres - and at the back | stood a two storied structure that served as a | changing boom, an inner chamber, or a balcony, as | circumstances required. Charges of admission were "3, | 2 and 1" - pence, not shillings. The | penny patrons stood in the yard, while two penny | patrons and "gentlemen" were provided with seats, | which were raised on galleries that surrounded the | stage on three sides. The acting was, it is believed | very rapid, and probably one side of the stage was | used for one scene while the other half was being | prepared for the next.

|

Whether the actors were good or bad we have no | means of knowing. Prior to the building of the | theatres players were performed in the yards of inns, | by companies of "strolling players." No doubt these | gentry were in the habit of stealing eggs, etc; at | any rate, they were eventually proscribed as "rogues | and vagabonds," by an Act that remains unrepealed to | the present day. Noblemen who desired to witness | plays therefore entailed these strolling players | amongst their retainers, and the companies known as | "Lord Leicester's Servants," "The Lord Chamberlain's | Servants," thus acquired a sort of charter, and | reputability, and attracted to their ranks both | actors and writers of ability.

|

There are no women on the Shakespearian stage. | Women's parts were taken by boys, and Shakespeare's | women were therefore, as a rule, limited to a range | of emotions capable of being understood by boys. The | costumes were gorgeous, and in some sense compensated | for the lack of elaborate scenery. Music and singing | also served to relieve the monotony of the drama. |

|

Such, in brief, were the conditions under which | the great dramatic art of the period was presented to | the public. The differences between the rough stage | of the sixteenth century and the elaborate settings | of the present day is vast indeed, by not so marked | as the contrast with the simple grandeur of the Greek | theatres.

|

Here we must, for the time, break off. We have, as | it were, set the stage for the entry of Shakespeare, | and in our next articles we will proceed to examine | his life and work, as well as that of some of his | great contemporaries.